Nuclear Thermal Propulsion: Powering Future Space Travel

Nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) systems are not new, but they could significantly reduce travel times and carry greater payloads than today's top chemical rockets. NTP systems work by pumping a liquid propellant, most likely hydrogen, through a reactor core. Uranium atoms split apart inside the core and release heat through fission. This physical process heats up the propellant and converts it to a gas, which is expanded through a nozzle to produce thrust. NTP systems are more energy-dense than chemical rockets and twice as efficient. They can also provide solar-independent power for years with minimal need for refuelling and maintenance.

Nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) systems are powered by fission

Nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) systems are powered by nuclear fission reactions, similar to those used in nuclear power plants and submarines. Here's how they work and why they're a promising option for space travel:

Fission-Based Propulsion

NTP systems use a process called fission to generate heat and thrust. A liquid propellant, typically hydrogen, is pumped through a reactor core containing uranium atoms. These uranium atoms split apart (fission) and release a large amount of heat energy. This heat energy raises the temperature of the propellant, converting it from a liquid to a gas. The gas is then expanded and expelled through a nozzle, creating thrust and propelling the spacecraft forward.

Advantages of NTP Systems

NTP systems offer several advantages over traditional chemical rockets:

• Higher Efficiency: NTP rockets are more energy-dense and efficient than chemical rockets. They can achieve a specific impulse (a measure of engine efficiency) of 900 seconds, twice that of chemical rockets, which combust liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen.
• Increased Payload Capacity: By using lighter hydrogen gas, NTP systems can carry larger payloads. The lighter gas is easier to accelerate, allowing the rocket to travel farther on less fuel.
• Reduced Travel Time: NTP systems can significantly reduce travel times to deep space destinations, such as Mars. This not only makes missions more feasible but also limits the crew's exposure to harmful cosmic radiation.
• Flexible Mission Profiles: NTP systems provide greater flexibility for mission planning. They enable broader launch windows, independent of orbital alignments, and offer the capability for astronauts to abort missions and safely return to Earth if needed.

Safety and Development

NTP systems are designed with safety in mind. They will not be used during launch or in Earth's atmosphere. Instead, they will be launched into space by chemical rockets and activated at a safe distance from Earth. NTP systems are also focused on using low-enriched uranium fuel, which can be manufactured using advanced techniques, potentially reducing security-related costs associated with highly enriched fuel.

The concept of NTP is not new, and research has been ongoing since the 1960s. NASA and the U.S. Department of Energy (formerly the Atomic Energy Commission) have been working together to improve designs, materials, and fuels. With continued advancements, NTP systems show great promise for future space exploration, particularly for long-duration missions to Mars and beyond.

NTP systems are more efficient than chemical rockets

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) systems are more than twice as efficient as chemical rockets. This is because NTP systems use lighter gases, which are easier to accelerate. Chemical rockets, on the other hand, produce water vapour, a much heavier byproduct. This means that NTP systems can travel further on less fuel.

The performance of rocket engines is measured by engineers as specific impulse, which is the amount of thrust that can be produced from a specific amount of propellant. Chemical rockets that combust liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen have a specific impulse of 450 seconds, while the initial target for nuclear-powered rockets is 900 seconds—twice the propellant efficiency.

NTP systems are powered by fission, with uranium atoms splitting inside the core and releasing heat. This heat converts the liquid propellant into a gas, which is then expanded through a nozzle to produce thrust.

The development of NTP systems has been supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and NASA, with the latter aiming to use the technology to send astronauts to Mars. NTP systems could significantly reduce travel times and carry greater payloads than today's chemical rockets, increasing the potential for deep space exploration.

NTP systems won't be used at launch

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) systems will not be used on Earth. They will be launched into space by chemical rockets before being activated. NTP systems are not designed to produce the amount of thrust needed to escape Earth's gravity.

The first ground tests of NTRs as a spacecraft propulsion technology took place in 1955. The United States maintained an NTR development program through 1973 when it was shut down. Although more than ten reactors of varying power output have been built and tested, no nuclear thermal rocket has ever flown.

In 1944, Stanisław Ulam and Frederic de Hoffmann contemplated the idea of controlling the power of nuclear explosions to launch space vehicles. In the same year, Qian Xuesen presented his research on "thermal jets" powered by a porous graphite-moderated nuclear reactor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

In 1948 and 1949, physicist Leslie Shepherd and rocket scientist Val Cleaver produced a series of groundbreaking scientific papers that considered how nuclear technology might be applied to interplanetary travel. They examined both nuclear-thermal and nuclear-electric propulsion.

Early NASA engine development through Project Rover began in 1955 at Los Alamos National Laboratory. The world's first experimental nuclear rocket engine, KIWI-A, was tested in 1959. This work was continued through the NASA NERVA program (1961-1973). Despite these advances, NTP systems still face challenges related to material science and safety concerns.

In summary, while NTP systems offer significant advantages in terms of efficiency and payload capacity, they will not be used during launch due to the required thrust levels and the potential risks associated with atmospheric use.

NTP systems will provide greater flexibility

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) systems offer greater flexibility for deep space missions. They can reduce travel times to Mars by up to 25%, which is a significant advantage over today's top chemical rockets. This reduction in travel time also limits the exposure of the flight crew to cosmic radiation, reducing potential health risks.

NTP systems also enable broader launch windows that are not dependent on orbital alignments. This means that astronauts can abort missions and return to Earth if necessary, increasing the safety and flexibility of space missions. The use of NTP systems can also reduce the overall mission duration by half, providing more efficient and timely space exploration.

The development of NTP systems is focused on using low-enriched uranium, which can potentially reduce security-related costs associated with highly enriched fuel. This technology is not new, and current designs are based on research conducted by NASA and the Atomic Energy Commission (now the U.S. Department of Energy) in the 1960s.

NTP systems have the potential to revolutionize space travel by providing greater flexibility, efficiency, and safety for deep space missions.

NTP systems are focused on using low-enriched uranium

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) systems are focused on using low-enriched uranium, which is a shift from the highly enriched uranium (HEU) used in the past. This shift to low-enriched uranium is being pursued for several reasons, including cost reduction and safety.

The Department of Energy (DOE) is working with NASA to test, develop, and assess the feasibility of using new fuels that require less uranium enrichment for NTP systems. This fuel may be manufactured using advanced manufacturing techniques, which could help reduce security-related costs associated with highly enriched fuel.

The use of low-enriched uranium in NTP systems is being carefully evaluated to ensure it meets the mission, lifetime, and operability requirements of NTP missions. One of the key advantages of low-enriched uranium reactors is that they offer less stringent safety, security, and proliferation concerns compared to highly enriched uranium reactors.

The Idaho National Laboratory is currently assisting NASA in developing and testing fuel composites at its Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility. The initial testing has shown promising results, with the nuclear fuels under development capable of withstanding the harsh temperatures required for nuclear thermal propulsion without sustaining significant damage.

The development of NTP systems using low-enriched uranium is a collaborative effort between NASA, DOE, and industry partners. Three industry teams were selected in 2021 to further develop designs, and NASA and DOE continue to work together to improve the technology and make nuclear-powered space travel a reality.

Frequently asked questions