Exploring The Possibility Of Near-Light Speed Travel

The idea of travelling at the speed of light has long been an attractive one, especially for sci-fi writers. At that speed, you could circle the Earth more than seven times in a second, and humans would be able to explore outside our solar system. However, according to Albert Einstein's theory of special relativity, summarised by the famous equation E=mc2, it is not possible for anything with mass, such as spacecraft and humans, to travel at the speed of light. Even for very tiny things, like subatomic particles, the amount of energy (E) needed to near the speed of light is incredibly challenging.

Despite this, it may be possible to travel at near light speed. NASA outlines three ways that acceleration to near light speed happens: electromagnetic fields, magnetic explosions, and wave-particle interactions. The energy requirements for such travel are immense, and there are many challenges to overcome, but some scientists are optimistic that near light speed travel will be possible in the near future.

Energy requirements

To travel at near light speed, an enormous amount of energy is required. Brice N. Cassenti, an associate professor with the Department of Engineering and Science at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, stated that at least 100 times the total energy output of the entire world [in a given year] would be needed to send a probe to the nearest star.

The energy required to accelerate a ship to near light speed is extremely high. The energy needed increases exponentially as the speed of the ship approaches the speed of light. This means that accelerating a ship from 90% to 99% the speed of light requires much more energy than accelerating it from 0% to 90% the speed of light.

The energy requirements for near light-speed travel are so high that they are currently beyond our technological capabilities. Even with future technological advancements, it is unlikely that we will ever be able to reach the speed of light due to the infinite amount of energy required.

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is the largest and highest-energy particle accelerator on Earth. It has been able to accelerate protons (particles within atoms) to 99.99999896% the speed of light. However, reaching 100% would require near-infinite energy.

To put the energy requirements into perspective, accelerating one ton to one-tenth of the speed of light requires at least 450 petajoules or 4.50 x 10^17 joules or 125 terawatt-hours. This is equivalent to the world energy consumption in 2008, which was 143,851 terawatt-hours.

The energy requirements for near light-speed travel are a major challenge and would need to be addressed before such travel becomes possible.

Collisions with cosmic dust and gas

Travelling at near-light speed is a hypothetical concept that comes with its own set of challenges. One of the major challenges is the risk of collisions with cosmic dust and gas.

At such high speeds, even a tiny particle of dust or atom can cause significant damage to the spacecraft. The energy released in the collision is enough to cause local heating, which can lead to evaporation or melting of the spacecraft material. While hydrogen and helium atoms are the most common in interstellar space, heavier atoms like oxygen, magnesium, and iron are the ones that will cause the most harm.

Cosmic dust presents a unique problem. Small dust particles will bombard the spacecraft simultaneously, acting like a swarm of gas atoms. Larger dust particles, around 15 micrometers in size, can be catastrophic, though they are rare.

To mitigate these risks, researchers have proposed various shielding methods, such as limiting the cross-section of the craft or using materials like graphite to better dissipate heat.

The challenge of collisions with cosmic dust and gas is a critical factor that needs to be addressed before near-light-speed travel can become a reality.

Time dilation

Time, for anything moving, changes. One of the most startling consequences of special relativity is that any moving clock slows down relative to a stationary observer. There are many different types of clocks, from digital watches to atomic clocks, and even our biological clocks, but they are all equally affected by the same principle: moving clocks run slow.

The speed of light is very close to 300,000 km per second (186,300 miles per second). It is only when we get to speeds that are a large fraction of the speed of light that any change in the flow of time becomes apparent. However, at speeds close to the speed of light, the effect grows in magnitude very rapidly, and time almost comes to a standstill. This slowing down of clocks due to high speeds is called time dilation and has a precise mathematical relationship.

The equation for time dilation is:

T = t0 / sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2)

Where:

• T = time observed in the other reference frame
• T0 = time in the observer's own frame of reference (rest time)
• V = the speed of the moving object
• C = the speed of light in a vacuum

For example, if we travel at 95% of the speed of light, time will slow down to about one-third of that measured by a stationary observer. Note that while we can get as close to the speed of light as our technology allows, it is impossible to actually reach 100% of the speed of light.

The faster an object moves, the greater the impact on time dilation. At 0.5 times the speed of light, there is only a small change in time dilation, but at speeds over about 75% of the speed of light, the effect is quite dramatic.

The consequences of time dilation can be illustrated by the so-called "twin paradox". In this paradox, one identical twin is sent at very high speed into space. Because the twin is travelling at a very high speed, all the clocks on board the rocket, including the twin's body clock, slow down. When the twin returns, they will have aged only a little compared to the Earth-bound twin (whose clock has been running normally).

If we were to launch a round-trip flight to a nearby exoplanet—let's say 10 or 50 light-years away—how would that affect time for humans on the spaceship versus humans on Earth? When the space travellers returned, they would be younger than their same-age friends and family who stayed on Earth. Exactly how much younger depends on how fast the spacecraft was moving and accelerating, but to reach an exoplanet 10 to 50 light-years away and make it home before dying of old age, one would have to be moving at close to the speed of light.

Human survival

According to Albert Einstein's theory of special relativity, it is impossible for anything with mass, such as humans, to travel at the speed of light. As an object with mass approaches the speed of light, its mass starts to increase, and it would require infinite energy to reach and maintain this speed.

However, humans could potentially survive near light-speed travel. The biggest issue would be the acceleration—actually reaching that speed. Too much acceleration force can hurt and even kill us. At high accelerations, your blood will have trouble pumping to your extremities, and you will pass out. If the force doesn't lessen or stop, you will eventually die as your body is starved of oxygen.

To accelerate to light speed more safely, it would take over five months to reach that speed, assuming a straight line and no air resistance. At the acceleration of free fall, it would take almost a year.

If humans could move at near light speed, they would experience the effects of relativity on time. Time would move more slowly for them than for people moving at more everyday speeds, though their experience of time wouldn't change. If they could observe people moving at "normal" speed, those people would appear to be moving in slow motion.

There are also other dangers to consider. For example, space is not entirely frictionless, and even sparse matter can cause serious damage at high speeds. Additionally, the bonds that hold molecules together would become ineffective, causing the human body to fall apart.

Therefore, while it may be theoretically possible for humans to survive near light-speed travel, there are significant challenges and risks that need to be addressed to make it a reality.

Light speed as a cosmic speed limit

The speed of light is an incredible 299,792,458 meters per second. To put that into context, at that speed, you could circle the Earth more than seven times in a second. It's no wonder then that humans have dreamed of travelling at light speed and beyond. But is it possible?

According to Albert Einstein's theory of special relativity, summarised by the famous equation E=mc2, the speed of light is a cosmic speed limit that cannot be surpassed. So, light-speed travel and faster-than-light travel are physical impossibilities, especially for anything with mass, such as spacecraft and humans. Even for tiny subatomic particles, the amount of energy (E) needed to reach the speed of light is a significant challenge.

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the largest and highest-energy particle accelerator on Earth, has boosted protons (particles within atoms) as close to the speed of light as we can get. But even a minuscule proton would require near-infinite energy to actually reach the speed of light, and humans haven't figured out how to generate that kind of energy yet.

However, it's worth noting that time dilation occurs when travelling at near-light speeds. This means that while decades may pass for the traveller, significantly more time will have passed on Earth. For example, if a traveller could maintain 1g of acceleration for a year, they would reach close to the speed of light. At this speed, a journey of 30,000 light-years to the centre of the Milky Way would take just 40 years ship-time. But according to those on Earth, the ship would come back around 60,000 years after it left!

While light-speed travel may not be possible, near-light-speed travel could be achievable in the future. For example, researchers at the University of Michigan are developing thrusters that use nanoparticles as propellant. Their technology is called "nanoparticle field extraction thruster", or nanoFET. These devices act like small particle accelerators, shooting conductive nanoparticles out into space.

While near-light-speed travel is theoretically possible, there are still many challenges to overcome, such as the enormous energy requirements and the potential damage from collisions with cosmic dust and gas.

Frequently asked questions